OM System

OM System M.Zuiko 17mm f/2.8

Olympus's 2009 M.Zuiko 17 mm f/2.8 pancake from the PEN E-P1 kit: a 34 mm-equivalent Micro Four Thirds prime, 22 mm long and 71 g.

Used from
£149
🔒 No signup needed 📦 UK stock only
RetailerPrice
Used
MPB
MPB used
Inspected used stock · 12-month warranty
£149
Check on MPB →
New
No new stock at our retailers
Prices are synced live from UK retailers. Not every product will be stocked by every retailer; older models may only be available second hand.
Core
Released
2009
Focal Length
17mm
Aperture
f/2.8
Compatible Mount
Micro Four Thirds
Filter Size
37mm
Dimensions
57mm diameter × 22mm length
Weight
71g
Weather Sealed
No
Optics & Focus
AF Motor
DC micromotor
Optical IS
None (relies on body IBIS)
Aperture Blades
5
Magnification
0.11x
Min. Focus Distance
20cm

Select up to 2 cameras to compare against the M.Zuiko 17mm f/2.8. It's always pinned as the baseline.

Select 1–3 cameras to compare

42 cameras compatible with the Micro Four Thirds mount.

GearScore™ — Suitability by Genre

Base score — computed from verified specs for an enthusiast shooting photo and video. Camera Match adjusts it for your skill level and priorities.

Portrait
4.1/10
Street
6.8/10
Travel
5.8/10
Wedding & Events
4.8/10
Vlogging & Video
4.7/10
Filmmaking
4.0/10
Documentary
4.4/10
Landscape
5.0/10
Casual
5.7/10
Food
2.9/10
Architecture
4.2/10
Astrophotography
4.0/10
Underwater
3.7/10
✅ Great For
🌆
Street 6.8 Strong on portability and focal length.
⚠️ Not Ideal For
🍽️
Food 2.9 Held back by close focusing and focal length.
🤿
Underwater 3.7 Held back by focal length and close focusing.
🎬
Filmmaking 4.0 Held back by video handling and maximum aperture.
📝 How suitability scores are calculated GearScore™ genre scores are calculated from this camera's verified specifications — autofocus, sensor, weight, weather sealing and more — weighted by what matters for each type of photography. Where a spec sheet misses something (e.g. a manual-focus rangefinder for street), we apply a documented editorial adjustment. Scores are not based on customer reviews. See our full methodology →
Go deeper

Keep exploring